2022 predictions: 3D printing software experts step in – 3DPrint.com

“Hopefully there will be more development towards software solutions that streamline workflows, enable material and parts traceability, and automate repetitive tasks with better integration with existing business software to enable more the use of AM for mass production, ”said Gallino. “We are also working on the development of our metal binder jet technology and we definitely see 2022 as the year when more precise and powerful software solutions will be developed to better predict the shrinkage and distortion of parts during sintering in order to to further accelerate the adoption of the binder. jet as mass production technology.

The integration here is a super important point. For a large company we have to play well with everything they have and people often see 3D printing as an island, but we are an asteroid cruising past a starry system of legacy software and processes. The key air break on the binder jet is indeed the ability to accurately account for and improve part shrinkage, which is different for different geometry sizes, shapes and wall thicknesses. Solving this key challenge can instantly transform our market.

Albert Falck is the owner and founder of reseller Lay3rs 3dprinting and AMPC Solutions BV, a company that manufactures automated print farm solutions, as well as cabinets to reduce printer emissions.

“I’m hoping to see more integration of materials and software simulation of the slicer to get it right the first time. 3D printer hardware with predictable quality output would be the holy grail of moving from prototyping to custom end-use products, ”said Falck. “Getting the design for additive manufacturing in place will help speed up the whole process. I expect software like AMFG and 3YOURMIND to have a huge impact on implementing AM on an industrial scale. These software tools to run your digital factory will be absolutely necessary and I would expect in 2022 to see more software on the market that meets this need.

I really like that Albert is focusing on using desktop 3D printers for manufacturing. A lot of people in industry forget about the desktop and a lot of office people forget about industrial printers, but the two will meet somewhere and compete against each other for years to come.

Stefaan Motte leads the software business of Materialize, the Belgian company that has completely dominated the 3D printing workflows for 30 years.

“If we’re looking at software for smart factories, I always like to talk about ‘Plan, do, check and learn’. The software must support the secular cycles of Planning a process, execute on this process, and quality assurance management to ensure that this process is fit. All of this is necessary, but it is the learning stage of this sequence that can make the difference, ”said Motte. “The software platforms that will run Industry 4.0 factories around the world will allow you to learn so that each production cycle is better than the next. One who can unify all data from all available sources using AI, insights, process insights and expert knowledge. It will be software that can enable a manufacturing company to learn on a continuous cycle. “

As a full but tight view, I like Stefaan’s approach. By focusing on learning throughout the process, I think companies can unlock a lot of value.

The final model, compensated for displacement during printing. Image courtesy of Autodesk.

Alexander Oster almost single-handedly coded Netfabb before moving to the head of additive manufacturing software at Autodesk. Oster told 3DPrint.com:

“We are increasingly finding that producers are focusing on developing custom process parameters specifically tailored to a given application, geometry and non-standard alloys. And with that comes a new (perhaps forced) opening of machine builders to allow their customers to look more and more in the box. Maybe we’ll even see some industrial machine startups go largely open source in 2022 in order to differentiate themselves. ”

I would like industrial companies to consider open source modalities! But the forces at work here are interesting to note. The diversity of outputs and inputs will bring more openness or sharing on the part of the equipment manufacturers. This topic and many others will be discussed at the Additive Manufacturing Strategies 2022 summit from March 1-3, where GE Additive is the vertical sponsor of our “Automation, Rapid Manufacturing and Software” program. Overall, I think 2022 will be a watershed year for software as we will see consolidation, interoperability, and increased competition.

Source link

Back To Top